This is one of those mindless, meaningless "news" items all internet media outlets feel compelled to throw at us to fill blank spaces on their web pages. So, naturally, I had to see it. The nothingness of the article was compelling enough, but, I had to ask myself, "How did I get here?". It didn’t take me long to figure it out, this is why:
I was hoping and praying it would be another Tara Reidesque boob shot, but it wasn’t. I was disappointed for sure, but not completely, there’s a lot of flesh in that pic, and she is one beautiful babe for sure.
Then, I started pondering why I went there so fast when I could have been reading about Dick Ebersole’s tragedy or the man who was killed by an exploding lava lamp. It didn’t take long to figure out, Pavlov’s dog rules all other urges. I responded to the natural stimulus ( an attractive female ), by nature of an unnatural stimulus ( computer image ), to elicit a response by the unrelated stimulus ( fantasy of scoring with an image ). 21st century Pavlov. Show me a pic of a beautiful babe, I come running.
So therefore, all articles I report on here that rely solely on basic instinctive natural stimulus and nothing else, will be in the "Pavlov’s dog" category. And, showing any interest in Heidi Klum’s fashion reality show is a perfect example for this category. I mean, what is "real" about the fashion world?
Need I say more?
Sphere: Related Content


